Showing posts with label climatechange. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climatechange. Show all posts

Thursday, October 29, 2026

Gigantic Iceberg Breaks Free In Antarctica, Revealing Ghostly Mega Nest Beneath

The scientists were on expedition in the Weddell Sea looking for Sir Ernest Shackleton’s lost ship, the Endurance which sank in 1915 and was discovered in 2022 – when they found the nesting grounds in a remote area which had, until recently, been underneath a large ice shelf.  When the 5,800-square-kilometre A68 iceberg calved from the Larsen C Ice Shelf, scientists were finally able to access the seabed beneath. It wasn’t easy. “As with a lot of Antarctic research we battled the cold, sieving freezing cold mud on the back deck for hours,” says Dr Michelle Taylor, head of science at Ocean Census.…….Continue reading….

By: Melissa Hobson

Source:  Discover Wildlife

.

Critics: 

An iceberg may flip, or capsize, as it melts and breaks apart, changing the center of gravity. Capsizing can occur shortly after calving when the iceberg is young and establishing balance. Icebergs are unpredictable and can capsize anytime and without warning. Large icebergs that break off from a glacier front and flip onto the glacier face can push the entire glacier backwards momentarily, producing ‘glacial earthquakes’ that generate as much energy as an atomic bomb.

Icebergs are generally white because they are covered in snow, but can be green, blue, yellow, black, striped, or even rainbow-colored. Seawater, algae and lack of air bubbles in the ice can create diverse colors. Sediment can create the dirty black coloration present in some icebergs. In addition to size classification (Table 1), icebergs can be classified on the basis of their shapes. The two basic types of iceberg forms are tabular and non-tabular.

Tabular icebergs have steep sides and a flat top, much like a plateau, with a length-to-height ratio of more than 5:1. This type of iceberg, also known as an ice island, can be quite large, as in the case of Pobeda Ice Island. Antarctic icebergs formed by breaking off from an ice shelf, such as the Ross Ice Shelf or Filchner–Ronne Ice Shelf, are typically tabular. The largest icebergs in the world are formed this way.

Non-tabular icebergs have different shapes and include:

  • Dome: An iceberg with a rounded top.
  • Pinnacle: An iceberg with one or more spires.
  • Wedge: An iceberg with a steep edge on one side and a slope on the opposite side.
  • Dry-dock: An iceberg that has eroded to form a slot or channel.
  • Blocky: An iceberg with steep, vertical sides and a flat top. It differs from tabular icebergs in that its aspect ratio, the ratio between its width and height, is small, more like that of a block than a flat sheet.

Prior to 1914 there was no system in place to track icebergs to guard ships against collisions despite fatal sinkings of ships by icebergs. In 1907, SS Kronprinz Wilhelm, a German liner, rammed an iceberg and suffered a crushed bow, but she was still able to complete her voyage. The advent of watertight compartmentalization in ship construction led designers to declare their ships “unsinkable”.

During the 1912 sinking of the Titanic, the iceberg that sank the Titanic killed more than 1,500 of its estimated 2,224 passengers and crew, seriously damaging the ‘unsinkable’ claim. For the remainder of the ice season of that year, the United States Navy patrolled the waters and monitored ice movements. In November 1913, the International Conference on the Safety of Life at Sea met in London to devise a more permanent system of observing icebergs. Within three months the participating maritime nations had formed the International Ice Patrol (IIP).

The goal of the IIP was to collect data on meteorology and oceanography to measure currents, ice-flow, ocean temperature, and salinity levels. They monitored iceberg dangers near the Grand Banks of Newfoundland and provided the “limits of all known ice” in that vicinity to the maritime community. The IIP published their first records in 1921, which allowed for a year-by-year comparison of iceberg movement.

Aerial surveillance of the seas in the early 1930s allowed for the development of charter systems that could accurately detail the ocean currents and iceberg locations. In 1945, experiments tested the effectiveness of radar in detecting icebergs. A decade later, oceanographic monitoring outposts were established for the purpose of collecting data; these outposts continue to serve in environmental study.

A computer was first installed on a ship for the purpose of oceanographic monitoring in 1964, which allowed for a faster evaluation of data. By the 1970s, ice-breaking ships were equipped with automatic transmissions of satellite photographs of ice in Antarctica. Systems for optical satellites had been developed but were still limited by weather conditions. In the 1980s, drifting buoys were used in Antarctic waters for oceanographic and climate research. They are equipped with sensors that measure ocean temperature and currents.

Side looking airborne radar (SLAR) made it possible to acquire images regardless of weather conditions. On November 4, 1995, Canada launched RADARSAT-1. Developed by the Canadian Space Agency, it provides images of Earth for scientific and commercial purposes. This system was the first to use synthetic aperture radar (SAR), which sends microwave energy to the ocean surface and records the reflections to track icebergs.

The European Space Agency launched ENVISAT (an observation satellite that orbits the Earth’s poles) on March 1, 2002. ENVISAT employs advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) technology, which can detect changes in surface height accurately. The Canadian Space Agency launched RADARSAT-2 in December 2007, which uses SAR and multi-polarization modes and follows the same orbit path as RADARSAT-1.

The freshwater injected into the ocean by melting icebergs can change the density of the seawater in the vicinity of the iceberg. Fresh melt water released at depth is lighter, and therefore more buoyant, than the surrounding seawater causing it to rise towards the surface. Icebergs can also act as floating breakwaters, impacting ocean waves.

Icebergs contain variable concentrations of nutrients and minerals that are released into the ocean during melting. Iceberg-derived nutrients, particularly the iron contained in sediments, can fuel blooms of phytoplankton. Samples collected from icebergs in Antarctica, Patagonia, Greenland, Svalbard, and Iceland, however, show that iron concentrations vary significantly, complicating efforts to generalize the impacts of icebergs on marine ecosystems.

In the last month

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Humans Accidentally Canceled The Next Ice Age, Scientists Say

 Image credit: Shutterstock

For billions of years, Earth has experienced periodic glacial cycles governed by its orbit around the Sun. No force on the planet could disrupt this eons-long cycle—until we came along. A new study published in the journal Science suggests that a new glacial period was beginning some 2,000 years ago, but by the 1960s, greenhouse gas emissions had raised global temperatures enough to reverse it. Future emissions could forestall the next ice age for hundreds of thousands of years, altering one of Earth’s most fundamental natural cycles………Continue reading…

Advertisement

By:  

Source: Gizmodo

.

Critics:

Rising temperatures are fueling environmental degradation, natural disasters, weather extremes, food and water insecurity, economic disruption, conflict, and terrorism. Sea levels are rising, the Arctic is melting, coral reefs are dying, oceans are acidifying, and forests are burning. While there is still time to limit global emissions to within 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels, the window of opportunity is closing fast, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

But as the transition to a low- or no-carbon future gains momentum, several bright spots are appearing on the horizon. The most recent report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—a group of hundreds of scientists working with the United Nations to analyze climate change research from around the world—names many serious risks brought on by the warming of our planet, but human extinction is not among them.

The world is now warming faster than at any point in recorded history. Warmer temperatures over time are changing weather patterns and disrupting the usual balance of nature. This poses many risks to human beings and all other forms of life on Earth. While the effects of human activities on Earth’s climate to date are irreversible on the timescale of humans alive today, every little bit of avoided future temperature increases results in less warming that would otherwise persist for essentially forever

Advertisement

The global average temperature rise is predicted to climb permanently above 1.5°C by between 2026 and 2042, with a central estimate of 2032, while business as usual will see the 2°C breached by 2050 or very soon after.Future changes are expected to include a warmer atmosphere, a warmer and more acidic ocean, higher sea levels, and larger changes in precipitation patterns.

Risk estimates. Given the limitations of ordinary observation and modeling, expert elicitation is frequently used instead to obtain probability estimates. Humanity has a 95% probability of being extinct in 7,800,000 years, according to J. The simulations also predict that the future of human evolution will suffer from thicker skulls and smaller brains in the year 3000, another side effect of technology making us lazy and causing us to lose some of our brain capacity due to lack of usage.

Even after those first scorching millennia, however, the planet has often been much warmer than it is now. One of the warmest times was during the geologic period known as the Neoproterozoic, between 600 and 800 million years ago. Conditions were also frequently sweltering between 500 million and 250 million years ago. 

Roughly 1.3 billion years from now, “humans will not be able to physiologically survive, in nature, on Earth” due to sustained hot and humid conditions. In about 2 billion years, the oceans may evaporate when the sun’s luminosity is nearly 20% more than it is now, Kopparapu said. Instead, Earth’s natural cycles and greenhouse effects might delay the onset of the next ice age, expected within the next 10,000 to 100,000 years.

 Some theories suggest global warming could potentially trigger an ice age by disrupting ocean currents, specifically the Gulf Stream, leading to dramatic cooling in Europe. We will survive another degree or so as well. However, with each increment in temperature the world we inhabit changes in response. We must adapt to those changes and deal with the disruption and deviation from equilibrium they cause.

We will survive another degree or so as well. However, with each increment in temperature the world we inhabit changes in response. We must adapt to those changes and deal with the disruption and deviation from equilibrium they cause. People and companies will produce their own electricity using reusable energy sources, making power plants and the use of fossil fuels obsolete. Space travel will become a common mode of transport, allowing us to travel to places such as colonies on solar planets, and planetary moons.

Advertisement

A group of closely-related organisms that have common physical and genetic characteristics and are able to interbreed to produce fertile offspring. As humans, we experience dramatically fewer hazards today than we did in our early evolution. However, genetic studies indicate that we are still evolving. Carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases are the main drivers of global warming.

While climate change cannot be stopped, it can be slowed. To avoid the worst consequences of climate change, we’ll need to reach “net zero” carbon emissions by 2050 or sooner. While the challenges of preventing dangerous climate change are immense, it is not too late to act. Immediate and sustained efforts are required to mitigate the worst impacts and support vulnerable populations

According to NCEI’s Global Annual Temperature Outlook, there is a 22% chance that 2024 will rank as the warmest year on record and a 99% chance that it will rank in the top five. January saw a record-high monthly global ocean surface temperature for the 10th consecutive month

Two new subjects to be added to Leaving Cert curriculum RTE 19:23 

.

GreenhouseGasEmissions ,ClimateAction ,Sustainability,EcoFriendly ,CarbonFootprint ,GlobalWarming ,#CleanEnergy ,EnvironmentalAwareness ,CarbonNeutral ,ClimateChange ,ReduceEmissions ,ClimateCrisis ,GoGreen ,RenewableEnergy ,EcoAwareness ,GHG ,NetZero ,SustainableLiving ,ClimateSolutions ,ActOnClimate, GlacialPeriod

Monday, October 19, 2026

Zodiac Warning! You’re Getting Hit With A Rare Double Retrograde

buradaki/Getty images

As if spooky season wasn’t scary enough, the universe decided to throw this double whammy your way. Sometimes, astrology predictions hit in a way that could make anyone a believer. And this month has the power to do just that. In fact, just today, a client told me she didn’t believe in astrology until she read the October predictions I gave her. So even if you’re not totally sold on cosmic guidance (or you’re just a Capricorn), you’ll want to pay attention this month. October 2026 is filled with one of the rarest, most cataclysmic events that could dismantle the relationships you thought were strong and prompt the ghosts of exes past to pay you a visit……….Continue reading..

By Katie Robinson

Source: Readers Digest

.

Critics:

Detected about once a day on average, gamma-ray bursts can appear anywhere in the sky with no warning. They are very distant events, with the closest-known example erupting more than 100 million light-years away. The record-setting duration of the July burst – named GRB 250702B – places it in a class by itself. Researchers have been eagerly discussing their findings. They agree the unprecedented event likely heralds a new kind of stellar explosion.

And they said the best explanation for the outburst is that a black hole consumed a star. But they disagree on exactly how it happened. Exciting possibilities include a black hole weighing a few thousand times the sun’s mass shredding a star that passed too close to it or a much smaller black hole merging with and consuming its stellar companion.

Of the roughly 15,000 gamma-ray bursts observed since astronomers first discovered the phenomenon in 1973, none are as long, and only a half dozen even come close. Because opportunities to study such events are so rare, and because they may reveal new ways to create gamma-ray bursts, astronomers are particularly excited about the July burst.

Most bursts last from a few milliseconds to a few minutes. Also, they’re known to form in two ways: either by a merger of two city-sized neutron stars or the collapse of a massive star once its core runs out of fuel. Each produces a new black hole. Some of the matter falling toward the black hole becomes channeled into tight jets of particles that stream out at almost the speed of light, creating gamma rays as they go.

But neither of these types of bursts can readily create jets able to fire for days, which is why 250702B poses a unique puzzle. The Gamma-ray Burst Monitor on NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope discovered the burst. It triggered the instrument multiple times over the course of three hours. Also detecting the burst was:

The Burst Alert Telescope on NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, the Russian Konus instrument on NASA’s Wind mission, the Gamma-Ray and Neutron Spectrometer on Psyche – a NASA spacecraft currently en route to asteroid 16 Psyche – and Japan’s Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image instrument on the International Space Station.

Eric Burns is an astrophysicist at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge and a member of Neights’ team studying the burst’s gamma-ray glow. The Wide-field X-ray Telescope on China’s Einstein Probe also detected the burst in X-rays. And it showed that a signal was present the previous day. The first precise location came early July 3 when Swift’s X-Ray Telescope imaged the burst in the constellation Scutum, near the crowded, dusty plane of our Milky Way galaxy.

Given this location and the day-earlier X-ray detection, astronomers wondered if this event might be a different type of outburst from somewhere within our own galaxy.

More amazing space science

Larsen & Toubro wins news orders in clean energy space The Business Standard 08:26 Wed, 08 May 

.

CataclysmicEvents ,NaturalDisasters ,ClimateChange ,SurvivalStories ,ExtremeWeather ,Apocalyptic ,EarthChanges ,DisasterPreparedness ,EnvironmentalImpact ,NatureUnleashed ,GlobalWarming ,Catastrophe ,PlanetEarth ,EmergencyPlanning ,SustainableFuture ,HumanEndurance ,CrisisManagement ,NaturalCatastrophes ,UnpredictableNature

History Co-Author The AI System Used To Research & Write A Three-Book Narrative History Series

If you have ever asked an AI to write about history, you already know the feeling. The paragraphs look polished. Then you ask where a quote ...