Showing posts with label innerstrength. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innerstrength. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2026

Why Resilience Is Overrated For Business Owners 

Resilience is a favorite buzzword for many entrepreneurs. You’ll see it throughout pitch decks, founder stories, and LinkedIn posts. The idea is, if you’re able to endure enough, you’ll successfully come out the other side. Some 83% of founders experience high stress, struggling with imposter syndrome and rapidly losing confidence in the idea they were certain would work out…..Continue reading

By Egor Dubrovsky

Source:  Fast Company

.

Critics:

Physiological symptoms caused by the autonomic nervous system include blushing, perspiration, dizziness, or nausea. A feeling of paralysis, numbness, or loss of muscle tone might set in making it difficult to think, act, or talk. Children often visibly slump and hang their head. In an effort to hide this reaction, adults are more likely to laugh, stare, avoid eye contact, freeze their face, tighten their jaw, or show a look of contempt.

In another’s presence, there’s a feeling of being strange, naked, transparent, or exposed, as if wanting to disappear or hide. The Shame Code was developed to capture behavior as it unfolds in real time during the socially stressful and potentially shaming spontaneous speech task and was coded into the following categories: (1) Body Tension, (2) Facial Tension, (3) Stillness, (4) Fidgeting, (5) Nervous Positive Affect, (6) Hiding and Avoiding, (7) Verbal Flow and Uncertainty, and (8) Silence.

Shame tendencies were associated with more fidgeting and less freezing, but both stillness and fidgeting were social cues that convey distress to the observer and may elicit less harsh responses. Thus, both may be an attempt to diminish further shaming experiences. Shame involves global, self-focused negative attributions based on the anticipated, imagined, or real negative evaluations of others and is accompanied by a powerful urge to hide, withdraw, or escape from the source of these evaluations.

These negative evaluations arise from transgressions of standards, rules, or goals and cause the individual to feel separate from the group for which these standards, rules, or goals exist, resulting in one of the most powerful, painful, and potentially destructive experiences known to humans.There are many different reasons that people might feel shame. According to Joseph Burgo, there are four different aspects of shame. He calls these aspects of shame paradigms.

  • Unrequited love: “Unreciprocated love that causes yearning for more complete love.”
  • Unwanted exposure: Something personal that we would like to keep private is unexpectedly revealed, or when we make a mistake in [a] public [setting].”
  • Disappointed expectation: “The feeling of dissatisfaction that follows the failure of expectations or hopes to manifest.”
  • Exclusion: Being left out of connection or involvement with others or groups that we would like to belong to.

In his first subdivision of shame he looks into is unrequited love; which is when you love someone but your partner does not reciprocate, or one is rejected by somebody that they like; this can be mortifying and shaming. Unrequited love can be shown in other ways as well. For example, the way a mother treats her new born baby. An experiment called “The Still Face Experiment” was done where a mother showed her baby love and talked to the baby for a set period of time.

She then went a few minutes without talking to the baby. This resulted with the baby making different expressions to get the mother’s attention. When the mother stopped giving the baby attention, the baby felt shame. According to research on unrequited love, people tend to date others who are similar in attractiveness, leaving those less attractive to feel an initial disappointment that creates a type of unrequited love in the person. The second type of shame is unwanted exposure.

This would take place if you were called out in front of a whole class for doing something wrong or if someone saw you doing something you did not want them to see. This is what you would normally think of when you hear the word shame. Disappointed expectation would be your third type of shame according to Burgo. This could be not passing a class, having a friendship go wrong, or not getting a big promotion in a job that you thought you would get.

The fourth and final type of shame according to Burgo is exclusion which also means being left out. Many people will do anything to just fit in or want to belong in society, e.g., at school, work, friendships, relationships, everywhere.

It has been suggested that narcissism in adults is related to defenses against shame and that narcissistic personality disorder is connected to shame as well. According to psychiatrist Glen Gabbard, NPD can be broken down into two subtypes, a grandiose, arrogant, thick-skinned “oblivious” subtype and an easily hurt, oversensitive, ashamed “hypervigilant” subtype.

The oblivious subtype presents for admiration, envy, and appreciation a grandiose self that is the antithesis of a weak internalized self which hides in shame, while the hypervigilant subtype neutralizes devaluation by seeing others as unjust abusers.

In a meta-analytic review performed in 2011, it was found that there were stronger associations with shame and depression than with guilt and depression. External shame, or a negative view of the self, seen through other people, had larger effect sizes correlated with depression than did internal shame. According to the anthropologist Ruth Benedict, cultures may be classified by their emphasis on the use of either shame (a shame society) or guilt to regulate the social activities of individuals.

Shame may be used by those people who commit relational aggression and may occur in the workplace as a form of overt social control or aggression. Shaming is used in some societies as a type of punishment, shunning, or ostracism. In this sense, “the real purpose of shaming is not to punish crimes but to create the kind of people who don’t commit them”

 Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals 

Self-Conscious Emotions”

Health-related shame: an affective determinant of health?”

 Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology.

Interpersonal Process in Therapy: An Integrative Model.

Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: support for a theoretical model”

The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture”

Cultural Models of Shame and Guilt” 

Feelings of shame, embarrassment and guilt and their neural correlates: A systematic review”.

 Facing Shame: Families in Recovery

Shattered Shame States and their Repair”

Shame and the Origins of Self-esteem: A Jungian Approach.

The Prevalence and Nature of Unrequited Love”

How To Deal With Shame In The Workplace”

Taxation: Federal Instrumentalities: Exemption from State Tax”

 Shame : Free Yourself, Find Joy, and Build True Self-Esteem 

Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation”.

A Review of: “Shame and Guilt””

Bradshaw on the Family: A New Way of Creating Solid Self-Esteem

Violence : reflections on a national epidemic.

Scanners are complicated’: why Gen Z faces workplace ‘tech shame’”

Mentalizing and the Role of the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus in Sharing Others’ Embarrassment”

Shame, the Veiled Companion of Narcissism”.

Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: A meta-analytic review”

Spray campaign debate heats up”

Photos: Fathers of Chinese Leaders at Revolutionary ‘Struggle Sessions’”

Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness”.

Measuring stigma in people with lung cancer: psychometric testing of the cataldo lung cancer stigma scale”

The Self-Conscious Emotions: Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment and Pride”

.

Resilience ,StrengthInAdversity ,OvercomingObstacles ,BounceBack MentalStrength StayStrong NeverGiveUp ,InnerStrength ,GrowthMindset ,ResilienceBuilding ,Empowerment ,Courage ,MotivationMonday ,FaceYourFears ,RisingAbove ,LifeChallenges ,Perseverance ,HealingJourney ,EmotionalResilience ,StrongerTogether

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Is There Any Science Behind Willpower? Possibly, and It Could Influence Long Term Goals

Zamrznuti tonovi/Shutterstock

Motivational psychologists are finding that it’s not just whether a person believes they have willpower. The amount of willpower a person believes they possess can influence both everyday choices and larger goal-setting. “When people say things like ‘I have no willpower with cake’ or ‘I have no willpower with social media,’ that highlights something important even though our beliefs about willpower can be fairly general and shape how we approach self-control……..Continue reading

By : Emilie Le Beau Lucchesi

Source:Discover Magazine

.

Critics:

Willpower or Counteractive self-control theory focuses on how desires interact with goals. Desire is an affectively charged motivation toward a certain object, person, or activity, often, but not limited to, one associated with pleasure or relief from displeasure. Desires differ in their intensity and longevity. A desire becomes a temptation when pursuing it would conflict with an individual’s goals.

One limitation in researching desire is that people experience a wide variety of desires, which differ in frequency, strength, and relevance to personal goals. In a large experience-sampling study, 7,827 desire reports were collected over one week, capturing variation in desire intensity, the degree of conflict with other goals, and the likelihood of resisting a desire successfully. The most common and strongly felt desires were those related to bodily needs such as eating, drinking, and sleeping.

Self-control dilemmas occur when long-term goals clash with short-term outcomes. Counteractive Self-Control Theory states that when presented with such a dilemma, we lessen the significance of the instant rewards while momentarily increasing the importance of our overall values. When asked to rate the perceived appeal of different snacks before making a decision, people valued health bars over chocolate bars.

However, when asked to do the rankings after having chosen a snack, there was no significant difference of appeal. Further, when college students completed a questionnaire prior to their course registration deadline, they ranked leisure activities as less important and enjoyable than when they filled out the survey after the deadline passed. The stronger and more available the temptation is, the harsher the devaluation will be.

One of the most common self-control dilemmas involves the desire for unhealthy or unneeded food consumption versus the desire to maintain long-term health. An indication of unneeded food consumption could be overspending on eating away from home. Not knowing how much to spend, or overspending one’s budget on eating out, can be a symptom of a lack of self-control.

Participants in one study rated a new snack as less healthy when it was described as very tasty rather than only slightly tasty. This evaluation pattern reflects counteractive self-control, where a tempting attribute leads people to devalue that option to support a health goal. In another experiment, participants shown one large bowl of chips representing a strong temptation perceived the chips as higher in calories and ate less of them than participants given three smaller bowls containing the same total amount.

Weak temptations are falsely perceived to be less unhealthy, so self-control is not triggered and desirable actions are more often engaged in; this supports the counteractive self-control theory. Weak temptations present more of a challenge to overcome than strong temptations, because they appear less likely to compromise long-term values. High-level construals involve thinking about actions and outcomes in a broad, abstract way, whereas low-level construals involve thinking about them in concrete, detailed terms.

These different construal levels influence how individuals activate self-control when facing temptations. One way researchers induce high-level construals is by asking a series of “why?” questions that prompt increasingly abstract responses; low-level construals are elicited with “how?” questions that focus on concrete details. When completing an Implicit Association Test, participants induced into high-level construals pair unhealthy temptations (such as candy bars) with “bad” and healthy options (such as apples) with “good” more quickly than low-level participants.

They are also more likely to choose an apple over a candy bar in behavioral tasks. Even without deliberate self-control, simply adopting a high-level construal can reduce the pull of temptations by shifting attention to broader goals and values, such as maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The manipulation of the environment to make some responses easier to physically execute and others more difficult illustrates this principle.

This can be physical guidance: the application of physical contact to induce an individual to go through the motions of a desired behavior. It can also be a physical prompt. Examples of this include clapping one’s hand over one’s own mouth, placing one’s hand in one’s pocket to prevent fidgeting, and using a ‘bridge’ hand position to steady a pool shot; these all represent physical methods to affect behavior.Manipulating emotional conditions can induce certain ways of responding.

One example of this can be seen in theatre. Actors often elicit tears from their own painful memories if it is necessary for the character they are playing to cry. One may read a letter or book, listen to music, or watch a movie, in order to get in the proper state of mind for a certain event or function.  Additionally, considering an activity either as “work” or as “fun” can have an effect on the difficulty of self-control.

Research has proposed that self-control performance may be influenced by glucose availability in the brain. Early studies reported that engaging in acts of self-control reduced circulating glucose, and that lower glucose levels or reduced glucose tolerance were associated with poorer performance on subsequent self-control tasks, particularly under demanding or novel conditions. These findings formed the basis of the glucose-depletion model, which proposed that self-control is metabolically costly and reliant on accessible glucose.

A competing account argues that the key factor is not total glucose supply but the allocation of glucose to effortful tasks. Under this view, the brain generally has sufficient metabolic resources, but motivational priorities determine whether glucose is directed to mechanisms supporting self-control. As of 2024, this allocation-based model has not been empirically tested. Aristotle spoke about self-control as a key value that can guide decision making and support a good life.

He contrasted self-control with the vice of akrasia which he described as acting against one’s better judgment. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle discussed the significance of this value in leading a virtuous life. Similarly, Plato wrote about self-control in relation to both mental and physical pleasures. Examples of self-control as a virtue appear in Aristotle’s treatment of temperance, which involves having a well-chosen and well-regulated set of desires.

The vices associated with failures of temperance are self-indulgence (excess) and insensibility (deficiency). Deficiency or excess refers to the degree to which temperance is present. For example, a deficiency of temperance leads to overindulgence, while too much restraint can result in insensitivity or unreasonable control. Aristotle used the following analogy: the intemperate person is like a city with bad laws; the person without self-control is like a city with good laws that are not enforced…

Leave a Reply

Viral FB Posts PLR The Amazing Done For You Question Style Viral Image Posts

This is 1,200 brand spanking new viral Facebook posts in the money niche that have been designed specifically to get attention, to get enga...