Showing posts with label HealthyChoices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HealthyChoices. Show all posts

Monday, November 9, 2026

If Sugar Is So Bad For Us, Why Is The Sugar In Fruit OK?

Shutterstock/Dulin

We hear regularly from health organisations and experts that we should eat less sugar. But we’re also told we should eat more fruit. All types of sugar will give us the same amount of calories, whether they are from fruit or soft drink. But the health risks of eating sugar are related to consuming too many “free sugars” in the diet, not from eating sugars that are naturally present in fruits or milk. Sugar in food and drinks comes in various forms. Sugar molecules are classified as monosaccharides (single sugar molecules such as glucose and fructose) and disaccharides (more complex structures such as sucrose and lactose).….Story continues….

By: &

Source: The Conversation

.

Critics:

Sugar refiners and manufacturers of sugary foods and drinks have sought to influence medical research and public health recommendations, with substantial and largely clandestine spending documented from the 1960s to 2016. The results of research on the health effects of sugary food and drink differ significantly, depending on whether the researcher has financial ties to the food and drink industry.

A 2013 medical review concluded that “unhealthy commodity industries should have no role in the formation of national or international NCD [non-communicable disease] policy”. Similar efforts to steer coverage of sugar-related health information have been made in popular media, including news media and social media. A 2003 technical report by the World Health Organization (WHO) provides evidence that high intake of sugary drinks (including fruit juice) increases the risk of obesity by adding to overall energy intake.

By itself, sugar is doubtfully a factor causing obesity and metabolic syndrome. Meta-analysis showed that excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increased the risk of developing type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome – including weight gain and obesity – in adults and children. Sugar consumption does not directly cause cancer. Cancer Council Australia have stated that “there is no evidence that consuming sugar makes cancer cells grow faster or cause cancer”.

There is an indirect relationship between sugar consumption and obesity-related cancers through increased risk of excess body weight. The American Institute for Cancer Research and World Cancer Research Fund recommend that people limit sugar consumption. There is a popular misconception that cancer can be treated by reducing sugar and carbohydrate intake to supposedly “starve” tumours. In reality, the health of people with cancer is best served by maintaining a healthy diet.

Despite some studies suggesting that sugar consumption causes hyperactivity, the quality of evidence is low and it is generally accepted within the scientific community that the notion of children’s ‘sugar rush’ is a myth. A 2019 meta-analysis found that sugar consumption does not improve mood, but can lower alertness and increase fatigue within an hour of consumption.

One review of low-quality studies of children consuming high amounts of energy drinks showed association with higher rates of unhealthy behaviors, including smoking and excessive alcohol use, and with hyperactivity and insomnia, although such effects could not be specifically attributed to sugar over other components of those drinks such as caffeine.

The WHO, Action on Sugar and the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) consider free sugars an essential dietary factor in the development of dental caries. WHO have stated that “dental caries can be prevented by avoiding dietary free sugars”. A review of human studies showed that the incidence of caries is lower when sugar intake is less than 10% of total energy consumed. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is associated with an increased risk of tooth decay.

The “empty calories” argument states that a diet high in added (or ‘free’) sugars will reduce consumption of foods that contain essential nutrients. This nutrient displacement occurs if sugar makes up more than 25% of daily energy intake, a proportion associated with poor diet quality and risk of obesity. Displacement may occur at lower levels of consumption. The WHO recommends that both adults and children reduce the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake, and suggests a reduction to below 5%.

“Free sugars” include monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods, and sugars found in fruit juice and concentrates, as well as in honey and syrups. According to the WHO, “[t]hese recommendations were based on the totality of available evidence reviewed regarding the relationship between free sugars intake and body weight (low and moderate quality evidence) and dental caries (very low and moderate quality evidence).”

On 20 May 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced changes to the Nutrition Facts panel displayed on all foods, to be effective by July 2018. New to the panel is a requirement to list “added sugars” by weight and as a percent of Daily Value (DV). For vitamins and minerals, the intent of DVs is to indicate how much should be consumed. For added sugars, the guidance is that 100% DV should not be exceeded. 100% DV is defined as 50 grams.

For a person consuming 2000 calories a day, 50 grams is equal to 200 calories and thus 10% of total calories—the same guidance as the WHO.[151] To put this in context, most 12-US-fluid-ounce (355 ml) cans of soda contain 39 grams of sugar. In the United States, a government survey on food consumption in 2013–2014 reported that, for men and women aged 20 and older, the average total sugar intakes—naturally occurring in foods and added—were, respectively, 125 and 99 g/day.

Manufacturers of sugary products, such as soft drinks and candy, and the Sugar Research Foundation have been accused of trying to influence consumers and medical associations in the 1960s and 1970s by creating doubt about the potential health hazards of sucrose overconsumption, while promoting saturated fat as the main dietary risk factor in cardiovascular diseases.

In 2016, the criticism led to recommendations that diet policymakers emphasize the need for high-quality research that accounts for multiple biomarkers on development of cardiovascular diseases.

Low-histamine diet: Is this the new food trend to watch? FoodNavigator.com 12:07 

In the last 8 hours
Yesterday

Experts find cavemen ate mostly vegan, debunking paleo diet The Independent 23:35 Wed, 01 May 

.

SugarInFruits ,HealthyEating ,FruitFacts ,NaturalSugar ,NutritionTips ,HealthyLifestyle ,FruitLover ,WholeFoods ,FreshFruits ,SugarContent ,FruitNutrition ,HealthyChoices ,DietaryGuidelines ,FoodScience ,WellnessJourney,EatYourFruits ,BalancedDiet ,NaturalSweetness ,FruitBenefits

Saturday, September 26, 2026

8 Simple Daily Habits Of People Who Need Naps & Quiet Time To Function

daily habits people need naps quiet time to function

Roman Samborskyi | Shutterstock

As I write this, I’m wondering if I will have time for a nap today. Clearly, I am one of those people who need a lot of naps and quiet time to function, and people like us develop habits that give us the space we need to recharge. If I don’t have time to unwind after overstimulating situations, I can easily become frustrated. Like, you better give me some space frustrated. Everyone has dealt with fatigue at some point, but it’s easier to navigate for some than others. Some can drink a cup of coffee and jump back into the day as if nothing happened……..Continue reading..

By: Haley Van Horn

Source: YourTango

.

Critics:

The term self-awareness is used across several disciplines to describe related but distinct phenomena. Broadly, it refers to the capacity to direct attention inward and recognize oneself as an individual, separate from the environment and from other beings. However, researchers distinguish between two main forms: reflective self-awareness and social self-awareness.

Reflective self-awareness refers to the recognition of one’s own consciousnessthe ability to think about thoughts, to know that one is perceiving, feeling, and existing. It is often described as “awareness of awareness” and forms the basis for introspection, metacognition, and personal identity.

This sense of self-awareness is studied in philosophy of mind, neuroscience, and comparative cognition, where it is linked to neural processes of reflection and self-recognition. Social self-awareness refers to understanding oneself as perceived by others and within social contexts. It includes the ability to evaluate one’s behavior, emotions, and presentation relative to social norms or expectations. This meaning is common in psychology, where it underlies theories of self-conscious emotions, social behavior, and empathy.

In this sense, self-awareness overlaps with self-evaluation, self-monitoring, and self-regulation.These two meanings often interact—reflective awareness provides the inner model of the self that social awareness then extends to interpersonal situations.

In contemporary research, distinguishing between these levels helps clarify how self-awareness can involve both private consciousness and public self-perception.With this conceptual framework in place, we next examine the neural basis of reflective self-awareness. Modern neuroscience treats self-awareness not as the product of a single “center,” but as the emergent behavior of interacting brain systems.

Functional MRI, lesion, and connectivity studies implicate a distributed network—particularly the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, and temporoparietal junction—in processes of self-reflection and self-modelling. These regions overlap substantially with the brain’s default mode network and engage in metacognitive monitoring—feedback loops in which predictions about internal and external states are continuously compared with incoming sensory and emotional input.

Such neural machinery underlies the experience of being aware that one is aware. Experimental evidence suggests that self-awareness depends on the brain’s capacity for metacognition—the monitoring and evaluation of its own processes. Such “monitoring systems” continually compare predicted sensory and emotional states with actual input, generating the experience of being aware of awareness itself. This feedback architecture allows the brain to notice discrepancies between expectation and perception, forming the foundation of conscious self-reflection.

This recursive feedback process gives rise to the sensation of being aware of awareness, sometimes described as a “mirror of mirrors” within consciousnessNeuroscientific models therefore interpret self-awareness as a dynamic property of the brain’s integrative and self-modelling systems, not as a function of a single mechanism. Self-awareness in psychology encompasses how individuals perceive, evaluate, and regulate their own internal states, actions, and identities. It involves both introspective attention—awareness of thoughts and emotions—and embodied attention—awareness of one’s physical presence in the world.

Body awareness refers to the ability to perceive one’s physical form and position in space as belonging to the self. It combines sensory feedback from proprioception (the sense of muscle and joint position), interoception (the perception of internal bodily states), and visual–spatial input.  This integration creates the feeling of embodiment—the sense that “this body is mine.”Psychological and neurological research indicates that body awareness is not fixed but flexible. Experiments such as the rubber-hand illusion demonstrate that visual and tactile cues can alter the perceived boundaries of the body.

Disorders like somatoparaphrenia, in which individuals deny ownership of a limb, or depersonalization, in which one feels detached from the body, reveal how fragile this aspect of self-awareness can be. Body awareness also interacts with emotional and social processes: heightened interoceptive sensitivity has been linked to stronger emotional self-awareness, while disruptions to bodily representation are associated with conditions such as eating disorders and body dysmorphia. These findings suggest that self-awareness arises partly from the brain’s dynamic mapping of its own physical state in the world.

Following perceptual embodiment, psychological theories such as objective self-awareness posit that, Self-awareness theory, developed by Duval and Wicklund in their 1972 landmark book A Theory of Objective Self-Awareness, states that when we focus on ourselves, we evaluate and compare our current behavior to our internal standards and values. This elicits a state of objective self-awareness. We become self-conscious as objective evaluators of ourselves. Self-awareness should not be confused with self-consciousness.

Various emotional states are intensified by self-awareness. However, some people may seek to increase their self-awareness through these outlets . People are more likely to align their behavior with their standards when they are made self-aware. People are negatively affected. If they do not live up to their personal standards. Various environmental cues and situations induce awareness of the self, such as mirrors, an audience, or being videotaped or recorded. These cues also increase the accuracy of personal memory.

.

HealthyDailyHabits ,WellnessJourney ,FitLife ,HealthyLifestyle ,DailyHabits ,MindfulLiving ,SelfCare ,NutritionMatters ,FitnessMotivation ,HealthyChoices ,MindsetMatters ,Wellbeing ,HolisticHealth ,DailyWellness ,ActiveLifestyle ,HealthyRoutine ,InvestInYourself ,HappinessGoals ,LiveWell

Leave a Reply

76 DIY Christmas Ornaments To Make In 2025

Becky Lugart-Stayner It’s officially Christmas-tree decorating season! Of course, you’ll want to pull out those beloved sentimental ornamen...