Showing posts with label EmotionalHealing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EmotionalHealing. Show all posts

Monday, October 26, 2026

You’ve Heard of Quiet Quitting. What About A Quiet Divorce?

(Illustration by Kimberly Elliot/For The Washington Post)

Marriages don’t always end with in-your-face blowout fights. Some fizzle slowly and silently over time. On paper, Amanda Thomas got divorced in 2025. But if you ask her, her marriage really ended two years earlier. Their 20 years together didn’t unravel from one dramatic fallout. For a long time, there was still love. There was stability, too: two kids, a house and a husband with a steady career. There was no single night she could point to and say, That’s when I fell out of love………Continue reading….

By Jenna Ryu

Source: The Washington Post

.

Critics:

The elevation of divorce rates among couples who cohabited before marriage is called the “cohabitation effect”. Evidence suggests that although this correlation is partly due to two forms of selection (a) that persons whose moral or religious codes permit cohabitation are also more likely to consider divorce permitted by morality or religion .

That marriage based on low levels of commitment is more common among couples who cohabit than among couples who do not, such that the mean and median levels of commitment at the start of marriage are lower among cohabiting than among non-cohabiting couples), the cohabitation experience itself exerts at least some independent effect on the subsequent marital union.

In 2010, a study by Jay Teachman published in Journal of Marriage and Family found that women who have cohabited or had premarital sex with men other than their husbands have an increased risk of divorce and that this effect is strongest for women who have cohabited with multiple men before marriage. To Teachman, the fact that the elevated risk of divorce is only experienced when the premarital partner(s) is someone other than the husband indicates that premarital sex and cohabitation are now a normal part of the courtship process in the United States.

This study only considers data on women in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth in the United States. Divorce is sometimes caused by one of the partners finding the other unattractive. Recent studies show that the cohabitation effect on divorce varies across different cultures and periods. Another article published in Journal of Marriage and Family found that when cohabitation was uncommon in pre-reform China, premarital cohabitation increased the likelihood of subsequent divorce, but this association disappeared when cohabitation became prevalent.

Women are six times more likely to be separated or divorced soon after a diagnosis of cancer or multiple sclerosis than men. A review found a small decrease of divorce rate associated with most cancer types, but stated methodological weakness for many published studies which studied the association between divorce and cancer. Some of the effects associated with divorce include academic, behavioral, and psychological problems.

Although this may not always be true, studies suggest that children from divorced families are more likely to exhibit such behavioral issues than non-divorced families. Research done at Northern Illinois University on Family and Child Studies suggests that divorce of couples experiencing high conflict can positively affect families by reducing conflict in the home. There are, however, many instances when the parent-child relationship may suffer due to divorce.

Financial support is many times lost when an adult goes through a divorce. The adult may be obligated to obtain additional work to maintain financial stability. This can lead to a negative relationship between the parent and child; the relationship may suffer due to a lack of attention towards the child and minimal parental supervision. Studies have also shown that parental skills decrease after a divorce occurs; however, this effect is only a temporary change.

“Many researchers have shown that a disequilibrium, including diminished parenting skills, occurs in the year following the divorce but that by two years after the divorce re-stabilization has occurred and parenting skills have improved.” Some couples choose divorce even when one spouse’s desire to remain married is greater than the other spouse’s desire to obtain a divorce. In economics, this is known as the Zelder Paradox and is more familiar with marriages that have produced children and less common with childless couples.

Research has also found that recent divorcees report significantly higher hostility levels after the divorce than before, and that this effect applies equally to both male and female divorcees. In an American Psychological Association study of parents’ relocation after a divorce, researchers found that a move has a long-term effect on children. In the first study conducted amongst 2,000 college students on the effects of parental relocation relating to their children’s well-being after divorce, researchers found major differences.

In divorced families in which one parent moved, the students received less financial support from their parents compared with divorced families in which neither parent moved. These findings also imply other negative outcomes for these students, such as more distress related to the divorce and did not feel a sense of emotional support from their parents.

Although the data suggests negative outcomes for these students whose parents relocate after divorce, there is insufficient research that can alone prove the overall well-being of the child A newer study in the Journal of Family Psychology found that parents who move more than an hour away from their children after a divorce are much less well off than those parents who stayed in the same location.

Research has shown that children are greatly affected by the disunion of their parents’ marriage. In most cases these effects are displayed in academic strain, difficulty in regulating mood and emotions, and a tendency to find outlets in harmful substances or activities such as drugs, alcohol, and violence. Frequently, children who have experienced a parental divorce have lower academic achievement than children from non-divorced families.

A review of family and school factors related to adolescents’ academic performance noted that a child from a divorced family is two times more likely to drop out of high school than a child from a non-divorced family. These children from divorced families may also be less likely to attend college, resulting in the end of their academic career. Often academic problems are associated with children from single parent families.

Studies have shown that this may be directly related to the economic effect of divorce. A divorce may result in the parent and children moving to an area with a higher poverty rate and a poor education system, because of the financial difficulties of a single parent. Children of divorced parents also on average achieve lower levels of socioeconomic status, income, and wealth accumulation than children of parents who remain married.

These outcomes are associated with lower educational achievement. Young men or women between the ages of 7 and 16 who had experienced the divorce of their parents were more likely than youths who had not experienced the divorce of their parents to leave home because of friction, to cohabit before marriage, and to parent a child before marriage.

Washington Wizards’ Midnight League builds relationships on and off the court NBC Washington 20:43 Sat, 21 Dec 

.

QuietDivorce ,DivorceJourney ,PeacefulSeparation ,LifeAfterDivorce ,EmotionalHealing ,SelfDiscovery ,NewBeginnings ,MindfulLiving ,HealingProcess ,CoParenting ,RelationshipGoals ,StressFreeDivorce ,LifeTransition,HealthyChoices ,Empowerment,PersonalGrowth ,MovingOn ,DivorceSupport ,MentalHealth

Friday, October 2, 2026

How To Deal With Your Childhood Trauma As An Adult

Vicky Leta – In-House Art

Recovering from trauma is hard no matter when it happens. However, if adversity happens during childhood, it can be especially hard to overcome. Unlike adults, children have very little control over their environment. If a child is living in an abusive home, their ability to remove themselves from that environment is extremely limited, whereas an adult will usually have more emotional and financial resources with which to escape. Meanwhile, children are still learning what healthy relationships look like, as well as how to cope with difficult situations……….Continue reading…

Source:  Lifehacker

.

Critics:

Trauma in children, also known as pediatric trauma, refers to a traumatic injury that happens to an infant, child or adolescent. Because of anatomical and physiological differences between children and adults the care and management of this population differs. There are significant anatomical and physiological differences between children and adults.

For example, the internal organs are closer in proximity to each other in children than in adults; this places children at higher risk of traumatic injury. Children present a unique challenge in trauma care because they are so different from adults – anatomically, developmentally, physiologically and emotionally.

A 2006 study concluded that the risk of death for injured children is lower when care is provided in pediatric trauma centers rather than in non-pediatric trauma centers. Yet about 10% of injured children are treated at pediatric trauma centers.

The highest mortality rates occur in children who are treated in rural areas without access trauma centers. An important part of managing trauma in children is weight estimation. A number of methods to estimate weight exist, including the Broselow tape, Leffler formula, and Theron formula. Of these three methods, the Broselow tape is the most accurate for weight estimation in children ≤25 kg, while the Theron formula performs better with patients weighing >40 kg.

Due to basic geometry, a child’s weight to surface area ratio is lower than an adult’s, children more readily lose their body heat through radiation and have a higher risk of becoming hypothermic. Smaller body size in children often makes them more prone to poly traumatic injury. Several classification systems have been developed that use some combination of subjective and objective data in an effort to quantify the severity of trauma.

Examples include the Injury Severity Score and a modified version of the Glasgow Coma Scale. More complex classification systems, such as the Revised Trauma Score, APACHE II, and SAPS II add physiologic data to the equation in an attempt to more precisely define the severity, which can be useful in triaging casualties as well as in determining medical management and predicting prognosis.

Though useful, all of these measures have significant limitations when applied to pediatric patients. For this reason, health care providers often employ classification systems that have been modified or even specifically developed for use in the pediatric population. For example, the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale is a modification of the Glasgow Coma Scale that is useful in patients who have not yet developed language skills.

Emphasizing the importance of body weight and airway diameter, the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) was developed to specifically reflect the vulnerability of children to traumatic injury. The minimal score is -6 and the maximum score is +12. There is a linear relationship between the decrease in PTS and the mortality risk (i.e. the lower the PTS, the higher the mortality risk).Mortality is estimated at 9% with a PTS > 8, and at 100% with a PTS ≤ 0.

In most cases the severity of a pediatric trauma injury is determined by the pediatric trauma score despite the fact that some research has shown there is no benefit between it and the revised trauma scale.The management of pediatric trauma depends on a knowledge of the physiological, anatomical, and developmental differences in comparison to an adult patient, this requires expertise in this area.

In the pre-hospital setting issues may arise with the treatment of pediatric patients due to a lack of knowledge and resources involved in the treatment of these injuries. Despite the fact there is only a slight variation in outcomes in adult trauma centers, definitive care is best reached at a pediatric trauma center.

Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‘s (CDC) WISQARS database for the latest year of data (2010), serious injury kills nearly 10,000 children in America each year. Pediatric trauma accounted for 59.5% of all mortality for children under 18 in 2004. Injury is the leading cause of death in this age group in the United States—greater than all other causes combined. It is also the leading cause of permanent paralysis for children. 

In the US approximately 16,000,000 children go to a hospital emergency room due to some kind of injury every year. Male children are more frequently injured than female children by a ratio of two to one. Some injuries, including chemical eye burns, are more common among young children than among their adult counterparts.

These are largely due to cleaning supplies and similar chemicals commonly found around the home. Similarly, penetrating injuries in children is because of writing utensils and other common household objects as many are readily available to children in the course of their day.

Unpacking Trauma in Childhood: New Book ZIP TAKES OFF HIS BACKPACK Considers Traumatic Experiences from a Child’s Perspective GlobeNewswire (Press Release) 23:31 Thu, 05 Sep 

UMC trauma chief reflects on treating victims of One October KSNV Las Vegas 10:15 

.

ChildhoodTrauma ,HealingJourney ,MentalHealthMatters ,BreakTheSilence ,HealingFromTrauma ,InnerChildWork ,TraumaAwareness ,PTSD ,EmotionalHealing ,TraumaInformed ,Resilience ,MentalHealthAdvocate ,ChildhoodHealing ,TherapeuticJourney ,LifeAfterTrauma ,Empowerment ,SupportAndHealing

Leave a Reply

Free Buyer Clicks For Life The Super Affiliate Marketing Coaching Art

This website gets over 250 million clicks daily in ALL niches, and NO ONE but Marc and I are using it to get automatic buyer clicks. This me...