Sunday, July 7, 2024

How To Complete a Technical SEO Audit In 8 Steps



For someone performing their first technical SEO audit, the results can be both overwhelming and intimidating. Often, you can’t see the wood for the trees and have no idea how to fix things or where to even begin.

After years of working with clients, especially as the head of tech SEO for a U.K. agency, I’ve found technical SEO audits to be a near-daily occurrence. With that, I know how important it is, especially for newer SEOs, to understand what each issue is and why it is important.

Understanding issues found within a technical audit allows you to analyze a site fully and come up with a comprehensive strategy…..Story continues….

By 

Source: How to Complete a Technical SEO Audit in 8 Steps

.

Critics:

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically.  The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review. 

 

Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links in addition to their URL submission console.

Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;however, this practice was discontinued in 2009. Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled. 

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches. In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.

In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version. In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. 

The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor. To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. 

Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine’s database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name=”robots” content=”noindex”> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl.

Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam. In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint not a directive. 

To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot’s meta tag should be included. A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.

 Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page’s metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site’s search listings, thus increasing traffic. 

URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page’s link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link’s popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design (“white hat”), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve (“black hat”). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO. 

White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing. An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines’ guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note.

 White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online “spider” algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. 

White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility, although the two are not identical. Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking

Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines’ algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices. 

Both companies, however, quickly apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google’s search engine results page. SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator’s goals. Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. 

Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search. A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site’s conversion rate.

In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public, which revealed a shift in their focus towards “usefulness” and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.

 

Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.

“SEO – search engine optimization”Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.Beel, Jöran and Gipp, Bela and Wilde, Erik (2010). “Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co” (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.

Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.

Brian Pinkerton. “Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler” (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.“Intro to Search Engine Optimization | Search Engine Watch”searchenginewatch.com. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 7, 2020.

Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). “Who Invented the Term “Search Engine Optimization”?”Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.

“The Challenge is Open”Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, pp. 189–211, November 17, 2020, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0S2CID 243130517archived from the original on August 14, 2022, retrieved September 20, 2021

Pringle, G., Allison, L., and Dowe, D. (April 1998). “What is a tall poppy among web pages?”. Proc. 7th Int. World Wide Web Conference. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). “Desperately Seeking Surfers”New York TimesArchived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). “Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO”ForbesArchived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). “Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to ‘Optimize’ Rankings”Wall Street JournalArchived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.

Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). “Legal Showdown in Search Fracas”Wired MagazineArchived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). “Confirming a penalty”. mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.“Google’s Guidelines on Site Design”Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.

“Bing Webmaster Guidelines”. bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.“Sitemaps”Archived from the original on May 3, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.“”By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet” Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015″Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.

Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine”. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.

“Google’s co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn’t been around nearly as long as Microsoft”. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). “Is Google good for you?”BBC NewsArchived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.

Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). “Link Spam Alliances” (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). “Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine”New York TimesArchived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.

Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). “Rundown On Search Ranking Factors”Search Engine WatchArchived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). “Understanding Search Engine Patents”Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.

“Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs”searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.“8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank”http://www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.“PageRank sculpting”. Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.

“Google Loses “Backwards Compatibility” On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting”. searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.“Personalized Search for everyone”Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.“Our new search index: Caffeine”. Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.

“Relevance Meets Real-Time Web”Google BlogArchived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.“Google Search Quality Updates”Google BlogArchived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.“What You Need to Know About Google’s Penguin Update”Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.“Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google”Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.

 “FAQ: All About The New Google “Hummingbird” Algorithm”. www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.

^ “Understanding searches better than ever before”. Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

^ “Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory”Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.

^ “What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?”Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.

^ “Search Console – Crawl URL”Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.

^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). “Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft’s Live Search”Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.

^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). “Efficient crawling through URL ordering”. Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ “Mobile-first Index”Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.

^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). “Mobile-first Indexing”. Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.

^ “The new evergreen Googlebot”. Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.

^ “Updating the user agent of Googlebot”. Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.

^ “Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?”Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). “Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?”. Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.

Jump up to:a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.

^ “Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community”http://www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.

^ Andrew Goodman. “Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES”. SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). “Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization”. searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ “What’s an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?”Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.

^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). “High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization”A List ApartArchived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). “Ramping up on international webspam”. mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). “Recent reinclusions”. mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Tapan, Panda (2013). “Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?”. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.

^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). “The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?”. Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.

^ “SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies”Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.

^ “”Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines” How Search Works November 12, 2015″ (PDF)Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.

^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). “Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time”. The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.

^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). “Condemned To Google Hell”Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.

^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). “Schmidt’s testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes”Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.

^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). “Search Engines as Leeches on the Web”. useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.

^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). “The search engine that could”. USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.

^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). “Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape”Search Engine WatchArchived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.

Jump up to:a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). “Search Engine Optimizing for Europe”. Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.

^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). “Google UK closes in on 90% market share”Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.

^ “Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M” (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.

^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). “Judge dismisses suit against Google”CNETArchived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.

^ “Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart’s Counsel”. blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.

^ “Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google”. blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Beginner’s Guide to Golf From Weekend Golfers

Credit to:  arminhamidian This course is aimed at complete beginners and for those who are still relatively new to the game and who are look...