Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Why Can’t We Walk Through Walls If Atoms Are Mostly Empty Space? 

 Henrik Sorensen via Getty Images

In movies, people phase through walls like ghosts think Vision from “Avengers” or Harry Potter going through Platform 9¾. It looks effortless. But in the real world, trying that trick would just leave you with a bruised nose and a lot of questions. One question, for instance, might be why can’t we walk through walls? Atoms, which are the building blocks of matter, are mostly empty space. The tiny nucleus which is about 100,000 times smaller than the whole atom sits at the center, while the electrons orbit far away. So why do solid objects feel so … solid?…….Continue reading…..

By

Source:  Live Science

.

Critics:

Electrostatics is a branch of physics that studies slow-moving or stationary electric charges on macroscopic objects where quantum effects can be neglected. Under these circumstances the electric field, electric potential, and the charge density are related without complications from magnetic effects. Since classical times, it has been known that some materials, such as amber, attract lightweight particles after rubbing.

The Greek word ḗlektron meaning ‘amber’, was thus the root of the word electricity. Electrostatic phenomena arise from the forces that electric charges exert on each other. Such forces are described by Coulomb’s law. There are many examples of electrostatic phenomena, from those as simple as the attraction of plastic wrap to one’s hand after it is removed from a package, to the apparently spontaneous explosion of grain silos, the damage of electronic components during manufacturing, and photocopier and laser printer operation.

The magnitude of the electrostatic force of attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.The force is along the straight line joining them. If the two charges have the same sign, the electrostatic force between them is repulsive; if they have different signs, the force between them is attractive.

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle (German: Pauli-Ausschlussprinzip) states that two or more identical particles with half-integer spins (i.e. fermions) cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state within a system that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. This principle was formulated by Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 for electrons, and later extended to all fermions with his spin–statistics theorem of 1940.

The Pauli exclusion principle describes the behavior of all fermions (particles with half-integer spin), while bosons (particles with integer spin) are subject to other principles. Fermions include elementary particles such as quarks, electrons and neutrinos. Additionally, baryons such as protons and neutrons (subatomic particles composed from three quarks) and some atoms (such as helium-3) are fermions, and are therefore described by the Pauli exclusion principle as well.

Atoms can have different overall spin, which determines whether they are fermions or bosons: for example, helium-3 has spin 1/ The Pauli exclusion principle underpins many properties of everyday matter, from its large-scale stability to the chemical behavior of atoms. According to the spin–statistics theorem, particles with integer spin occupy symmetric quantum states, and particles with half-integer spin occupy antisymmetric states; furthermore, only integer or half-integer values of spin are allowed by the principles of quantum mechanics.

In relativistic quantum field theory, the Pauli principle follows from applying a rotation operator in imaginary time to particles of half-integer spin. In one dimension, bosons, as well as fermions, can obey the exclusion principle. A one-dimensional Bose gas with delta-function repulsive interactions of infinite strength is equivalent to a gas of free fermions. The reason for this is that, in one dimension, the exchange of particles requires that they pass through each other; for infinitely strong repulsion this cannot happen.

This model is described by a quantum nonlinear Schrödinger equation. In momentum space, the exclusion principle is valid also for finite repulsion in a Bose gas with delta-function interactions, as well as for interacting spins and Hubbard model in one dimension, and for other models solvable by Bethe ansatz. The ground state in models solvable by Bethe ansatz is a Fermi sphere.

The Pauli exclusion principle helps explain a wide variety of physical phenomena. One particularly important consequence of the principle is the elaborate electron shell structure of atoms and the way atoms share electrons, explaining the variety of chemical elements and their chemical combinations. An electrically neutral atom contains bound electrons equal in number to the protons in the nucleus. Electrons, being fermions, cannot occupy the same quantum state as other electrons, so electrons have to “stack” within an atom, i.e. have different spins while at the same electron orbital as described below.

An example is the neutral helium atom (He), which has two bound electrons, both of which can occupy the lowest-energy (1s) states by acquiring opposite spin; as spin is part of the quantum state of the electron, the two electrons are in different quantum states and do not violate the Pauli principle. However, the spin can take only two different values (eigenvalues). In a lithium atom (Li), with three bound electrons, the third electron cannot reside in a 1s state and must occupy a higher-energy state instead.

The lowest available state is 2s, so that the ground state of Li is 1s22s. Similarly, successively larger elements must have shells of successively higher energy. The chemical properties of an element largely depend on the number of electrons in the outermost shell; atoms with different numbers of occupied electron shells but the same number of electrons in the outermost shell have similar properties, which gives rise to the periodic table of the elements.

The stability of each electron state in an atom is described by the quantum theory of the atom, which shows that close approach of an electron to the nucleus necessarily increases the electron’s kinetic energy, an application of the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg. However, stability of large systems with many electrons and many nucleons is a different question, and requires the Pauli exclusion principle. It has been shown that the Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the fact that ordinary bulk matter is stable and occupies volume.

This suggestion was first made in 1931 by Paul Ehrenfest, who pointed out that the electrons of each atom cannot all fall into the lowest-energy orbital and must occupy successively larger shells. Atoms, therefore, occupy a volume and cannot be squeezed too closely together. The first rigorous proof was provided in 1967 by Freeman Dyson and Andrew Lenard (de), who considered the balance of attractive (electron–nuclear) and repulsive (electron–electron and nuclear–nuclear) forces and showed that ordinary matter would collapse and occupy a much smaller volume without the Pauli principle.

A much simpler proof was found later by Elliott H. Lieb and Walter Thirring in 1975. They provided a lower bound on the quantum energy in terms of the Thomas-Fermi model, which is stable due to a theorem of Teller. The proof used a lower bound on the kinetic energy which is now called the Lieb–Thirring inequality. The consequence of the Pauli principle here is that electrons of the same spin are kept apart by a repulsive exchange interaction, which is a short-range effect, acting simultaneously with the long-range electrostatic or Coulombic force.

This effect is partly responsible for the everyday observation in the macroscopic world that two solid objects cannot be in the same place at the same time.Astronomy provides a spectacular demonstration of the effect of the Pauli principle, in the form of white dwarf and neutron stars. In both bodies, the atomic structure is disrupted by extreme pressure, but the stars are held in hydrostatic equilibrium by degeneracy pressure, also known as Fermi pressure. This exotic form of matter is known as degenerate matter.

The immense gravitational force of a star’s mass is normally held in equilibrium by thermal pressure caused by heat produced in thermonuclear fusion in the star’s core. In white dwarfs, which do not undergo nuclear fusion, an opposing force to gravity is provided by electron degeneracy pressure. In neutron stars, subject to even stronger gravitational forces, electrons have merged with protons to form neutrons.

Neutrons are capable of producing an even higher degeneracy pressure, neutron degeneracy pressure, albeit over a shorter range. This can stabilize neutron stars from further collapse, but at a smaller size and higher density than a white dwarf. Neutron stars are the most “rigid” objects known; their Young modulus (or more accurately, bulk modulus) is 20 orders of magnitude larger than that of diamond.

However, even this enormous rigidity can be overcome by the gravitational field of a neutron star mass exceeding the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit, leading to the formation of a black hole.

First Quantum Bit Made of Antimatter Captured in Physics Breakthrough ScienceAlert 15:32 Sat, 02 Aug

.

Electrostatics ,PhysicsFun ,ScienceExperiments ,StaticElectricity ,ElectrostaticForce ,ChargeAttraction ,PhysicsWonders ,STEMEducation ,ScienceIsCool ,ElectricCharge ,FunWithScience ,LearnWithUs ,EducationalVideo ,ElectrostaticField ,ScienceFacts ,ExperimentsForKids ,DiscoverElectrostatics ,PhysicsForEveryone ,ScienceChallenge, Physics, QuantumPhysics, Atoms, EmptySpace

Fediverse Reactions
  • #atoms
  • #chargeattraction
  • #experimentsforkids
  • #emptyspace
  • #electrostatics
  • #electrostaticfield
  • #electrostaticforce
  • #electriccharge
  • #educationalvideo
  • #funwithscience
  • #learnwithus
  • #physics
  • #physicsforeveryone
  • #physicsfun
  • #sciencefacts
  • #scienceexperiments
  • #sciencechallenge
  • #quantumphysics
  • #physicswonders
  • #scienceiscool

Leave a Reply

Strategy Is Buying Bitcoin Again but Its STRC Financing Engine Is the Real Worry

AFP via Getty Images

Strategy is back to buying Bitcoin after causing a stir with its first sale in years. But that controversy is the least of its problems. The company formerly known as MicroStrategy disclosed Monday it had snapped up 520 Bitcoin in the preceding week for an average price of $67,068 each, or $34.9 million in total. The transaction brings Strategy’s total holdings to 847,363 Bitcoin acquired for roughly $75,651 apiece……Continue reading

Source: Barron’s

.

Critics:

In 2024, the majority of Bitcoins are still out in the wild, so to speak. But, these large entities will likely keep growing their holdings over time and if they continue to be treated as a speculative investment and store of value.The surge in the crypto market since the past few days can be attributed to several factors driving renewed investor optimism and heightened interest in digital assets.

Despite facing challenges in 2023 due to global economic conditions, the market has demonstrated resilience and bounced back strongly. If Wood is correct and Bitcoin does reach $3.8 million by 2030, an investment of $1,000 would be worth over $60,000. This would result in a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 100%. Read Next: Bitcoin has jumped another 45% already this year – how much would you need to get started today?

Sarathy concurs that there are risks involved with investing in these cryptocurrencies, including price volatility, cybersecurity concerns and a lack of regulations compared to traditional currency. Ultimately, it’s up to each individual user how much risk they want to take. Specifically, bitcoin has moved like a speculative asset: a high-risk class of investments that draw interest for their potential to greatly increase, as opposed to their underlying utility. 

When interest rates shrank during the pandemic, allowing people to borrow and invest money more easily, bitcoin boomed. Dorsey, who led the social media platform from 2015 to 2021, developed a strong interest in crypto during that time and is now fully focused on the sector. Jack Dorsey believes the price of bitcoin could reach over $1 million by the end of 2030.

Bitcoin is more stable than it’s been in years, and the next halving is fast approaching. Taking current market conditions into account, now might well be the perfect time to invest, so long as you remain cognizant of the risks. Bitcoin is a risky investment with high volatility, and generally should be considered only if you have a high risk tolerance, are in a strong financial position already and can afford to lose some or all of your investment.

As of 2024, there are about 420 million cryptocurrency users globally. Of these, approximately 1.5 million individuals possess more than 1 Bitcoin, which is just 0.36% of all cryptocurrency users. Here’s the detailed breakdown: – Total Bitcoin Supply: The maximum number of Bitcoins is capped at 21 million. Bitcoin is not controlled by any single group or person. Instead, it is governed by multiple stakeholders — including developers, miners, and users.

Developers write the code that makes Bitcoin run; miners validate transactions; and users put the software to work by trading, transacting, holding, and more. Bitcoin is not controlled by any single group or person. Instead, it is governed by multiple stakeholders — including developers, miners, and users. Developers write the code that makes Bitcoin run; miners validate transactions; and users put the software to work by trading, transacting, holding.

Bitcoin is more stable than it’s been in years, and the next halving is fast approaching. Taking current market conditions into account, now might well be the perfect time to invest, so long as you remain cognizant of the risks. Investing in Bitcoin cryptocurrency has its pros and cons. While its transactions are relatively secure, it’s also prone to volatility, with large dips and spikes in price.

Cryptocurrencies are subject to high fluctuations in value. A decline in value or a complete loss are possible at any time. The loss of access to data and passwords can also lead to a complete loss.A reasonable assumption that Bitcoin could hypothetically reach the null state of it’s value is worth the thought. Even-though such an event is very less likely to take place, there are some factors that could theoretically lead to Bitcoin price crashing to zero.

It is quite likely that a bitcoin price crash will result in a correction in their prices as well. It is also certain that the vast majority of cryptocurrencies that populate the current listings will disappear. Over 100 million people in India own cryptocurrencies, making it the country with the most cryptocurrency owners, according to Triple-A. United States: China, Russia, Nigeria, and the EU are the next five countries with the most BTC trading volume on exchanges.

Bitcoin Whales Woke Up in 2025 and Moved Billions in BTC—Here’s Why  20:39 Sat, 27 Dec

What Is Oatzempic? Can The Viral Oat Drink Help You Lose Weight?

Elena Vafina / Getty Images Oatzempic is the latest nutrition trend to hit TikTok. The clever name pays ode to the popular drug Ozempic (whi...